|
| Home |
Bibliography #1 This bibliography reflects a very poor paper. The bibliography doesn't really follow any structure at all. The resources are generally poor, with four of the six resources Internet websites. The websites range from commercial sites to religious sites to a French Canadian site that is poorly translated. The two periodical references are from popular magazines which are poor choices for educational writing. Here is a corrected bibliography in MLA Style. Titles are underlined in MLA and article titles are in quotes. Periodicals need to include the date (or volume for a scholarly publication) and page numbers. Websites need to note the day the information was viewed. |
This bibliography reflects a very good paper. There are a variety of resources listed, all are very current. The included web resources are from reputable sites: a national foundation and the National Institute for Mental Health. The reference to a medical dictionary shows that research included sources that provide a solid foundation as well as more detailed sources. A research paper on autism could be cited using either APA or MLA Style. I've corrected the bibliography to reflect APA Style. There were few problems with formatting. In APA, first names are never included. Book and periodical titles are in italics. The date is always placed directly after the author's name.
This bibliography reflects an average paper, although it could be better. There is a good distribution of resources, although not all of them are current. Technology changes so quickly and resources from the 1990s are likely outdated. It is also important to look at the quality of information. "The Challenge of Electronic Crime" doesn't list an author and wasn't published in print, so we have no idea if the information is accurate or trustworthy. Here is a corrected bibliography in MLA Style. In MLA Style, the words "Volume" or "Vol." and "Issue" aren't used.
|